• Se spune că Mickey Mouse este o adevărată gaură semiotică. Când ne uităm la spațiul mioritic, avem corespondentul ideal al acestui haos semiotic: Crin Antonescu, un excelent expozeu al simulacrului… Iată ultima sa re-prezentare:

    Antonescu, pe urmele lui Ponta

    Publicat de Americanul pe: 27 martie, 2011 (www.reportervirtual.ro)

    Se pare că ideile socialiste sunt contagioase. Altfel nu pot să-mi explic de unde i-a venit domnului Crin Antonescu, preşedintele PNL, ideea de a propune ca cetăţenii români care locuiesc în străinătate să aibă dreptul de a vota în alegerile româneşti doar dacă plătesc cel puţin un impozit în România.

    „În timpul revoluţiei americane, cei din colonii spuneau «no taxation without representation”. Eu aş spune astăzi «no representation without taxation». În fond, ca cetăţean, eşti «coacţionar» al statului. Nu poţi doar să decizi asupra administrării lui, dar să nu participi cu nimic”. a spus el în cadrul interviului.

    Antonescu a spus că PNL se opune votului prin corespondenţă de „teama” că acesta este doar un instrument de fraudare a alegerilor.

    „Dacă nu am avea precedentul lui 2009 şi dubii extrem de serioase privind corectitudinea cu care instituţiile statului dominate de PD ar gestiona un asemenea sistem, poate că nu ne-am opune de principiu votului prin corespondenţă. Atâta vreme însă cât statul PD-ist funcţionează aşa cum funcţionează, mi-e teamă că votul prin corespondenţă nu e decât unul dintre instrumentele prin care se pregăteşte fraudarea alegerilor viitoare în scopul perpetuării actualei puteri”, a spus liderul liberal.

    Mi-aş permite să-l întreb pe domnul Antonescu doar câteva lucruri:

    1. Miliardele de dolari trimise în ţară de românii trăitori pe alte meleaguri datorită priceperii guvernanţilor de toate culorile, care s-au perindat pe la conducerea României din 1990 şi până în prezent, sunt considerate contribuţii care ne dau şi nouă dreptul de a vota?

    2. Dacă vă e atât de frică de frauda electorală ce căutaţi în alianţă cu PSD, un partid al cărui preşedinte a declarat public că ei au pierdut alegerile pentru că au furat mai puţin decât cei ce le-au câştigat? Sau frauda aliaţilor nu este tot fraudă?

    Ilustraţie: Baricada

  • Kingdom Of Comfort

    Save me save me
    From the kingdom of comfort where I am king
    From my unhealthy lust of material things

    I built myself a happy home
    In my palace on my own
    My castle falling in the sand
    Pull me out, please grab my hand
    I just forgot where I came from

    I rob myself of innocence
    With the poison of indifference
    I buy my stuff at any cost
    A couple of clicks and I pay the price
    Coz what I gain is someone else’s loss

    Save me save me
    From the kingdom of comfort where I am king
    To this kingdom of heaven where you are king

  • Sometime in 1970, Kurt Gödel’s mathematical proof of the existence of God began to circulate among his colleagues. The proof was less than a page long and caused quite a stir:

    Gödel’s Mathematical Proof of God’s Existence

    Axiom 1. (Dichotomy) A property is positive if and only if its negation is negative.
    Axiom 2. (Closure) A property is positive if it necessarily contains a positive property.
    Theorem 1. A positive property is logically consistent (i.e., possibly it has some instance).
    Definition. Something is Godlike if and only if it possesses all positive properties.
    Axiom 3. Being Godlike is a positive property.
    Axiom 4. Being a positive property is (logical, hence) necessary.
    Definition. A property P is the essence of x if and only if x has P and P is necessarily minimal.
    Theorem 2. If x is Godlike, then being Godlike is the essence of x.
    Definition. NE(x): x necessarily exists if it has an essential property.
    Axiom 5. Being NE is Godlike.
    Theorem 3. Necessarily there is some x such that x is Godlike.

    I obtained this proof from Hao Wang, Reflections on Kurt Gödel (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1987), page 195. How shall we judge such an abstract proof? How many people on Earth can really understand it? Is the proof a result of profound contemplation or the raving of a lunatic? Recall that Gödel’s academic credits were impressive. For example, he was a respected mathematician and a member of the faculty of the University of Vienna starting in 1930. He emigrated to the United States in 1940 and became a member of the Institute of Advanced Study in Princeton, New Jersey.

    (Clifford A. Pickover, A passion for mathematics: numbers, puzzles, madness, religion, and the quest for reality, John Wiley & Sons, 2005, p. 285-286)

  • Praying for the Enemy

    (via Philip Yancey Facebook page)

    … for Richard Dawkins, Ch. Hitchens et. Co 🙂 :

    Praying for the Enemy

    by Philip Yancey on Friday, March 11, 2011 at 11:49pm

    In 2006 I spoke to a group of Army chaplains, all colonels and generals, at Hilton Head, South Carolina. Having almost no personal exposure to the military, I was impressed by the pervasive discipline. Meetings started on the dot at “0800” or “0900,” speakers presented for at least an hour, and no cell phones went off or got used for text-messaging.

    Citing a passage in my book Prayer: Does It Make Any Difference? I told of the stunning scene I had witnessed at the headquarters of the Soviet KGB in 1991 when a Russian colonel repented of his nation’s behavior and vowed to place a copy of the New Testament in the hands of all two million members of the Russian army. After his passion and sincerity had melted my initial skepticism, I realized to my shame that I had disobeyed Jesus. “Love your enemies,” he said. “Pray for those that persecute you.” Not once in the Cold War of my lifetime—and I grew up within range of Soviet missiles in Cuba—had I prayed for my enemies.

    “Who are our enemies now?” I asked the chaplains. “We know them by name and face, for Donald Rumsfeld put bounties on their heads and distributed their images on a pack of playing cards to your troops.” I then flashed onscreen a photo of a dozen al-Qaeda terrorists. “What would happen if every church in the United States adopted a member of al-Qaeda, learned to pronounce his name, and prayed for him. Isn’t that what Jesus asked us to do?”

    A short time later I heard from an Army reserve chaplain whose commanding general had attended the gathering at Hilton Head. Just before mobilizing for a year of duty in Iraq, as part of his civilian ministry he launched a web-based prayer movement called Adopt a Terrorist for Prayer. He registered the website as ATFP.org, an ironic echo of the Defense Department’s own “Anti-Terrorism Force Protection.” On it he posts photos of actual terrorists from the FBI’s and State Department’s most-wanted lists and invites users to “adopt” one to pray for. More than 800 people have done so.

    Warfare against terrorists has a spiritual component, believes Thomas Bruce, the Army reserve chaplain, who has a doctorate in ministry. He recruited a board of directors who have experience with spiritual warfare, including an African-American survivor of the civil rights movement and a Cuban-American former agent of drug enforcement. As he deployed to Iraq, Bruce urged, “While I beg you to pray for soldiers, I beg you also to pray for their enemies. When God answers those prayers, this war will end.”

    Later, on returning from Iraq, Thomas reflected, “For the past year I have been in harm’s way at the front line of America’s national response to terrorism. Through this website everyone can join the front line of a Christian response.”

    He writes on the website, “The intent of terrorists is to inspire terror. According to Jesus, the antidote to fear is love. When we hate, we are reactive victims. When we love we seize the initiative. Love for country helps soldiers to risk their lives. Love for children enables parents to discipline them without being intimidated. Love for us took Jesus to the cross. Love for enemies will give courage to face, overcome, and transform them and the environment that breeds them.”

    Not everyone appreciates Thomas’s efforts. When CNN online reported on ATFP.org, reactions ran two to one against the effort.

    Some verged on ridicule: “Christians come up with some goofy stuff. This is right up there.” “Love your enemies, and your enemies will KILL you.”

    Some mocked prayer: “There is no end to the madness in religion; Prayers do nothing, well except for being a lame excuse for doing nothing.” And, “How about using this ‘prayer’ energy to feed starving children.”

    Some disagreed with the entire concept: “If you harbor anything but hatred for these terrorists, your morality is simply malfunctioning.”

    Some gave political retorts: “I decided to use this site and pray for G. W. Bush and Dick Cheney, but I couldn’t find them on the list.”

    Undaunted, Thomas is raising funds to improve and expand the website. Having served on the front lines, he has no illusions about the challenge that terrorists present. Nor does he underestimate the power of prayer, citing an example from the Book of Acts:

    Historically, Stephen was the first fatality in terrorism directed against Jesus’ followers. As Stephen died from stoning, he prayed, “Lord, do not hold this sin against them.” Later Saul, who had supervised Stephen’s stoning, met Jesus in a vision and repented. Can we pray today like Stephen prayed then?

    He adds one last poignant question, “Would Saul, who became the Apostle Paul, have met Jesus if Stephen hadn’t prayed?”