Apologetics
-
I have come to the conclusion that Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research programme – a possible framework for testable scientific theories (p.167) I do not think that Darwinism can explain the origin of life. I think it quite possible that life is so extremely improbably that nothing can “explain”
-
Einstein once wrote that our technology has outevolved our humanity, but he didn’t seem much concerned about it. In his subsequent writings he appeared to be convinced that our humanity will catch up with technology. Einstein was wrong, it didn’t! We are now witnessing how science – the mother of technology – is disassembling society
-
And now we are witnessing a transformation. A true opium of the people is a belief in nothingness after death – the huge solace of thinking that our betrayals, greed, cowardice, murders are not going to be judged… [but] all religions recognize that our deeds are imperishable (Czeslaw Milosz, The Discreet Charms of Nihilism, The
-
It is well known that we have a scientific censorship that defends the scientific establishment on our times. But what it happens when we have a public retention of knowledge according to its relevance or irrelevance? Who sets the agenda of what is knowledge? After almost 30 years after The Postmodern Condition (J. Fr. Lyotard),
-
În sfârșit am ajuns să țin în mâini și să citesc cartea lui Tim Keller, The Reason for God (Riverhead Books, New York, 2009). Ea este un exemplu de cum se poate face apologetică nu defensivă, așa cum am fost obișnuiți, ci una care demonstrează contradicțiile interne ale alternativelor filosofice, ce par indubitabile. Filosofiile relativismului
Alonewithothers's Blog 